Friday, May 21, 2010

The High Tribunal of Australia

In Wednesday's hearing of Kostas v HIA Insurance Services ([2010] HCATrans 121), Justin Gleeson SC fell into a faux pas that you can only get away with when your surname is Gleeson:

MR GLEESON: Thirdly, in relation to implicit decisions, could I refer the Tribunal to Custom Credit v Commercial Tribunal?

FRENCH CJ: You are not confusing us with a tribunal, I hope.

MR GLEESON: I apologise, your Honour.

HAYNE J: Good luck, Mr Gleeson.

MR GLEESON: Your Honours are still listening to my reply thus far, so I am doing well, I think.

[Heydon J must have been biting his tongue, see here (point 3)]

No comments:

Post a Comment

 
OUR TERMS
In case it is not abundantly clear from the context, none of what is written here should be considered legal advice or anything close to it.
The views expressed in each post are the views of the contributor who has authored that post only and should not be attributed to anyone else.
Feel free to quote or reproduce our posts for non-commercial purposes wherever you like but you need to attribute authorship. Click the CC logo to see our Creative Commons licence:

Creative Commons License