Thursday, April 29, 2010

Qld Industrial Court distinguishes Kirk

The recent High Court decision of Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission concerned, inter alia, the requisite particularity for a valid charge under NSW OH&S legislation. Recently, in the case of N.K. Collins Industries Pty Ltd v Peter Vincent Twigg (Unreported, Hall P, 27 April 2010, C/2009/56), the Industrial Court of Queensland refused to apply the Kirk decision in relation to a charge under the Queensland Work Safety Legislation.

Norton Rose has the scoop.
The decision can be found here.

The Court found the particular offence charged to be significantly different to that in Kirk. Indeed, the Court in Kirk said that (at [16]) "The scheme of [the NSW] legislation stood apart from other legislation of this type in Australia."  In any event its an interesting development for those interested in the formulation of charges under such legislation and a pretty bold move by the Industrial Court given the controversy surrounding Kirk.

[HT - David Cormack for the pointer]

No comments:

Post a Comment

 
OUR TERMS
In case it is not abundantly clear from the context, none of what is written here should be considered legal advice or anything close to it.
The views expressed in each post are the views of the contributor who has authored that post only and should not be attributed to anyone else.
Feel free to quote or reproduce our posts for non-commercial purposes wherever you like but you need to attribute authorship. Click the CC logo to see our Creative Commons licence:

Creative Commons License